Home | Videos | Site Map | About | Contact | Privacy | global warming

You like it? Share it!

Social Bookmarking

global warming Videos

Watching: Environmentalism video compilations

History of Environmentalism Posted by: CEIdotorg Video duration: 255 seconds Global video hits: 9081 Robert J. Smith, Director of the Center for Private Conservation, explains in this short video how the modern environmentalist movement began in America. A celebrated author and environmental historian, Smith shows how the antiwar movement during the 1960s evolved into an anti-capitalism movement that pushed for public stewardship of the environment. Read more by Robert J. Smith here cei.org . Related: environmentalism, private, conservation, cei, rj, smith, communism Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Environmentalists ... By: tjtheplay. on 19 Feb 12, 01:31:10 Environmentalists are stupid? and arrogant. I love? how they ... By: rgcooke. on 06 Feb 12, 04:38:04 I love? how they are gathering straw at 1:55 where he sets up his Soviet strawman. actually it did ... By: voiceofreason26. on 05 Feb 12, 12:49:45 actually it did register? only after i logged out and then back in. Phew. Cheers for free expression! Great film. Yes and ... By: voiceofreason26. on 05 Feb 12, 12:40:38 Great film. Yes and it won't register my thumbs up either. I'm really shocked by what looks like censorship. I believed this only happened in China? braincrops @ ... By: rickytherocktumbler. on 25 Jan 12, 23:56:46 braincrops @ wordpress c o m Please check it? out Its my? blog on environmentalist issues and ideaologies to follow! environmentalists ... By: Tbolt1000TForLife. on 23 Jan 12, 05:10:43 environmentalists are communists? and should all go to hell Capitalism is ... By: darrouken. on 10 Jan 12, 21:32:28 Capitalism is natural and not the problem,? it's the government. THE environmental A ... By: cutandshoottx. on 11 Nov 11, 05:50:06 THE environmental A/S/S hole's are why we don't make thing's in this country look at what was steel city now it is the most shit looking town ever but the american ppl let it all go know you all have the balls to think it will come and jobs will fall form the sky it has takin 30year's for it to go over and it will take 60 year 's? for it to come back,,,hungry eat an environmentalist @DirtCrashr they ... By: AlternateArtisan. on 24 Jun 11, 11:36:12 @DirtCrashr they said the same thing about labour unions and? workers rights. If the corperatists had it their way it would be like 18th century england all over again with kids in coal mines. @DarklingX perhaps, ... By: AlternateArtisan. on 24 Jun 11, 11:33:56 @DarklingX perhaps, but the government certainly hasn't done much in terms of keeping jobs from going overseas, yes, better environmental standards will cost more, but if all making companies cleaner does is force them overseas, the government needs to step in an put a tax or something on that so it? doesn't happen. You don't have to ... By: AlternateArtisan. on 15 May 11, 07:55:08 You don't have to abolish capitalism to achieve improved environmental standards. You just have to give it an incentive. Or? in the case of whats happening right now. A penalty for not meeting enviromental standards. I would think ... By: AlternateArtisan. on 15 May 11, 07:49:58 I would think enviromentalist are a backlash against greedy? fascists who exploit other countries. they did not know ... By: TaviYamato. on 23 Feb 11, 19:54:27 they did not know shit ,? I lived in Romania during communism and pollution was all over , look at cernobil , they also buit communist flats near factoryes to house workers , in an city that used to be so boem and nazi in the 40's . You like having an? ... By: Sunshinethefox. on 16 Feb 11, 22:00:38 You like having an? earth to live on? Then you'd be well advise to listen to them. Environmentalist ... By: TheCrwilliams. on 04 Dec 10, 21:32:20 Environmentalist are Communist. They try? to control everything and everyone. I didn't know? that ... By: Chainedorlo. on 17 Aug 10, 21:01:16 I didn't know? that part about the Vietnam protesters, that was really interesting. Where will you go ... By: gramosjr7. on 09 Aug 10, 08:41:22 Where will you go to when you die? Have you ever told lies, stolen, used God's name in vain, or looked at someone with lust? If yes, then you are a lying, theiving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart. When you die & stand before God you'll be guilty of breaking His law. The bible says you'll end up in Hell! So God sent God His Son Jesus to die for? your sins, & He rose from the dead on the third day. If you'll believe the Gospel(Jesus? died for your sins & was? resurrected) you'll be saved! o this is so true. ... By: iwalkjesuswaymommy7. on 28 Jul 10, 01:20:32 o this is so true. thank you? sr. wow. communism is? ... By: johnnyblackfoot73. on 27 Jul 10, 19:36:25 wow. communism is? awesome. I wonder how 50 to 80 year old "Russians" would react to this video? Lemmings then. ... By: tripphammer50. on 27 Jul 10, 17:45:22 Lemmings then. Lemmings now.? I was coming of age ... By: bamatecangel7. on 27 Jul 10, 17:36:42 I was coming of age during the period he profiles. Will being an environmentalist was the thing and to a lessor extent anti-war, there was a huge difference between the young in cities and those in small towns/rural areas. We were already environmentalist without the title, we cared about hunting/fishing/hiking outdoors more than our city cousins. Commies were not good and politicians fighting the war with rules was more the problem than war itself.? But the MSM played it like those scenes shown. Click thumbs? up ... By: xtaxplayer. on 27 Jul 10, 16:18:36 Click thumbs? up twice, that is what I had to do. Keep the faith! Good video. You ... By: steam0001. on 27 Jul 10, 15:52:36 Good video. You tube is up to its old tricks again. I gave your video the thumbs up but I guess your video is too controversial because they won't let my thumbs? up register.

The Anti-Human Mindset Of Environmentalists Posted by: noteviljustwrong Video duration: 214 seconds Global video hits: 19633 Talk to an environmentalist long enough, and eventually they will reveal their contempt for humans. The proof is in this exclusive clip from the forthcoming movie "Not Evil Just Wrong." "They care more about fish eggs than they do about children," said Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace. Related: not evil just wrong, phelim mcaleer, ann mcelhinney, global warming, climate change, al gore, environmental extremism, patrick moore, greenpeace Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Environmentalists? ... By: mrzisawesome. on 12 May 12, 18:17:00 Environmentalists? are assholes THIS IS LMFAOABLE U ... By: Thejadjadjad. on 09 May 12, 15:51:42 THIS IS LMFAOABLE U IDIOTS ENVIROMENT > POPULATION? WOW !!! go check ... By: Thejadjadjad. on 09 May 12, 15:46:53 WOW !!! go check the facts you ignorant shit communists my ass i think? you are fucking trolling if not then please listen to both sides yes? of course but ... By: Thejadjadjad. on 09 May 12, 15:45:24 yes? of course but my friend some areas are too cold Antarctica agree ?? some are too hot like the Empty Quarter of the Saudi Desert. and its not the amount of land we have its the resources we are lacking mate. 1/6th of the worlds population are starving. @ARGrandma1 I lost ... By: ThisHaloFan. on 08 May 12, 13:31:05 @ARGrandma1 I lost all respect for? you when you started talking about conservative conspiracy theories. Go back to the straight jacket please. Over population is ... By: ARGrandma1. on 06 May 12, 15:54:15 Over population is a myth. Every human being in the WORLD could? live in an area the size of Texas alone. That's where you ... By: ARGrandma1. on 06 May 12, 15:51:07 That's where you are wrong. Check out the man-made? epidemics in Africa. Check out what Progressives say about war. They considered it getting rid of 'stupid' people. Forced abortion is not killing? Forced sterilization is not killing? Communists and Marxists are taking control of the world using 'enviormentalism'. The UN is chocked full of Fabian Socialists, Marxists and Communists.Global warming is the biggest scam ever perpetuated on the world. @5oren Yeah, the ... By: ThisHaloFan. on 03 May 12, 07:49:19 @5oren Yeah, the vast majority of people who consider? themselves in population control aren't in favor of killing. Your suggestion is not a revelation whatsoever. Sure we are ... By: 5oren. on 24 Apr 12, 05:06:03 Sure we are probably over populated. But that doesn't mean that some of us should? just die. The population might go down eventually. If everyone just had one child for 100 years, the population would be halved. Sure it's over populated but there's nothing we can do about it but try not to populate it more (having 4+ kids in a family) There's a great new ... By: 2wheels88. on 31 Mar 12, 06:26:28 There's a great new video called Ecosystems a Genocidal Fraud.It's Australian but explains the fallacy of ecosystems in the environment.Well worth the watch.Oh you'll? find it on vimeo where free speech is still accepted,just google it,or better yet use Ixquick search,they don't spy on you. @NoEcologyNoEconomy ... By: o0thisismyusername0o. on 31 Mar 12, 04:54:54 @NoEcologyNoEconomy im atheist and not an environmentalist, so your argument is invalid. Besides, the point? was that humans are not evil, not that no one should care about nature 1st of all fucking ... By: Alexsuper15. on 21 Mar 12, 21:15:16 1st of all fucking population control is? a must, 2nd humans are one mess up monkeys Sorry---I? am NOT a ... By: zooeyhall. on 14 Mar 12, 13:22:23 Sorry---I? am NOT a creationist! @zooeyhall, ... By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 14 Mar 12, 01:39:37 @zooeyhall, reasonable environmentalists don't need to "believe" anything. They go on EVIDENCE of the fact that, without nature, Man would not EXIST. Therefore it's illogical to put Man before nature. Anti-environmentalists are invariably Creationists, who make no effort to understand nature beyond blind faith that it was "put here" by a deity to serve Man (never proved, just imagined). Disregarding? the importance of nature to Man's future is a crime, regardless of the odd Unabomber case. Let's see: Nature ... By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 14 Mar 12, 01:31:40 Let's see: Nature keeps humans alive but it's "anti-human" to want to keep nature intact enough to keep humans alive? I'm afraid I don't follow the logic. It's like saying being anti-smoking is anti-human. But I'm also not a Creationist who thinks humans are being kept alive by supernatural decree. Anti-environmentalists? tend to be Creationists. They don't understand how nature really functions, hence they stay trapped in a flawed dogma loop where pro-environmental thinking is anti-human. Let's see: Nature ... By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 14 Mar 12, 01:31:28 Let's see: Nature keeps humans alive but it's "anti-human" to want to keep nature intact enough to keep humans alive? I'm afraid I don't follow the logic. It's? like saying being anti-smoking is anti-human. But I'm also not a Creationist who thinks humans are being kept alive by supernatural decree. Anti-environmentalists tend to be Creationists. They don't understand how nature really functions, hence they stay trapped in a flawed dogma loop where pro-environmental thinking is anti-human. I have been doing ... By: zooeyhall. on 11 Mar 12, 17:28:12 I have been doing school research on Ted? Kaczynski the "Unabomber", when I accidentally came across this video post. Has anyone else noticed the startling similarities between the Unabomber's beliefs and actions, and alot of environmentalism's beliefs? I have never heard ... By: KuroDesucat. on 11 Mar 12, 03:34:19 I have never heard ANY environmentalist call for the MASS KILLING of people. The only time that has ever been said is when people like? you take a statement like "ideally, there should only be ~1billion people", and report it as "He said we have to kill people to balance the environment". It's ridiculous to think that anyone would say that. As well, I'll see your stance on Christians praying in public, and raise with "Do you think it's okay for Muslims to pray in public?" Be honest This is obviously ... By: KuroDesucat. on 11 Mar 12, 03:23:32 This is obviously propaganda being used to discredit environmentalist findings. I'm not liberal/conservative. I'm human &the truth I believe in: THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE ON THE EARTH. Enviro's aren't saying kill off people. Just pace ourselves. As with too much of anything, it becomes a problem and to? say we need more humans is to ignore reality: Humans are the #1 consumers of all of Earths resources. Saying we have to kill ourselves is stupid. More consumers= less resources = human extinction. Sorry 6 out of ... By: ductuslupus87. on 26 Feb 12, 18:12:33 Sorry 6 out of every? 7. Some people only ... By: ductuslupus87. on 26 Feb 12, 18:11:53 Some people only want 1 Billion humans? That would mean 1 out of every 7 would? have to volunteer for suicide. africa is ... By: knightschwartz. on 13 Feb 12, 11:08:22 africa is overpopulated by western aid. that should end. there flooding? western nations Not all ... By: augustandjune. on 07 Feb 12, 08:43:52 Not all environmentalists are pro-human...that's the point. Just like there are radical? fundamentalists in every religion, there are psychos in the Green movement. Do enough research, you'll see that corruption has easily infiltrated the agenda. Yep. I absolutely ... By: augustandjune. on 07 Feb 12, 08:35:13 Yep. I absolutely am amazed at their total hypocrisy. If a Christian wants to say a public prayer, they're called a bigot, racist, hate-spewing fool. Ah, but if a? leader openly talks about how killing 90%+ of the world's population will "save the environment," he/she is called rational, open-minded, and tolerant. I like living, thank you very much. I'm sure there are ways to have conservation without embracing James Bond villain-type madness. Nobody? is getting ... By: rgcooke. on 06 Feb 12, 04:42:51 Nobody? is getting rid of you, idiots.

Michael Crichton on Environmentalism as a Religion Posted by: Sidewinder77 Video duration: 261 seconds Global video hits: 85287 Michael Crichton on Environmentalism as a Religion Related: michael, crichton, environmentalism, religion Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Silly stuff. When ... By: DrBobStern. on 20 Apr 12, 17:41:47 Silly stuff. When one is poisoned, we can? recall an "Edenic time" when we weren't -- doesn't mean that the toxicologist who diagnosis it is a priest. He wants a clean environment (alludes to mismanagement in Yellowstone Park), calling for scientific environmentalism. Yet, when scientists (and environmentalists) point out how we are degrading the environment and must do better, they are to be dismissed as magical thinkers? Nah. The debate in the ... By: Parasmunt. on 17 Apr 12, 21:08:46 The debate in the US is led by politicians who argue that Jesus will correct any problems caused by mankind - that 'God' has created the Earth and the Earth is not a system on it's own that is affected by physics and cause and effect and can be degraded or destroyed -Instead ''God' will correct the? error we make'... Magical thinking like this is encouraged by major polluting corporations. Michael Crichton is grandstanding when these are really serious issues. The Earth should be ... By: Parasmunt. on 17 Apr 12, 21:03:40 The Earth should be our God, at least it is there - we know it is there and all that we are is dependent upon it, and lastly? it created us. This guy paid by big oil or some other right wing cause? Crichton NAILS it. ... By: ViviLiberoOMuori. on 26 Mar 12, 06:10:35 Crichton NAILS it. Here's why I believe so: Environmentalism is far more predominant in liberal? areas than in conservative areas. Large metropolitan areas are almost ALWAYS populated by a much higher % of liberals than are found in suburban or rural areas. Rural folks live with, and most times depend on nature. Their lifestyle must co-exist with their surroundings or else nature ceases to be nature.City folk love fighting for nature, yet refuse to coexist with it. Pollution is ... By: jhohcable. on 26 Mar 12, 05:52:42 Pollution is definitely bad, but Crichton has a point. Of course, his point isn't about pollution and that kind of stuff, it's about the weird worshipping of the concept of environmentalism (more than? the actual environment even). @TheTmantyla @ ... By: philWynk. on 20 Mar 12, 00:24:35 @TheTmantyla @regresseur Sorry, but you truly have no clue what "religion" means, and you have neither education nor even light reading in the field of anthropology. You really should keep your uninformed opinions to yourself until you have a little more education. A religion is any dogmatic system of thought? that addresses what the universe is and what man's role is in view of the universe. Your view of "science," for example, is a religious view. Yes, chum, it really is. Also there is no ... By: TheTmantyla. on 19 Mar 12, 23:46:13 Also there is no thought of any "entity" in the idiotic,? adoring and/or fearful ways the religious fear or worship theirs. Human-caused global warming is based on documented facts and trends, studied and reviewed and re-reviewed by thousands of researchers who understand the facts, the methods, the potential weaknesses of investigatory methods (and look for them rigorously, not only to protect their own reputations but to unearth truth!). CLEARLY no parallel. Go to a university. "Leftists"??? So ... By: TheTmantyla. on 19 Mar 12, 23:41:12 "Leftists"??? So every scientist, if he understands facts that oppose oil company interests, is automatically a leftist. Nice way to paint the sane ones crazy. FAIL! If you took time to read the emails, and understand climate science (beyond your? ability? or you'd be out getting a climate science Phd?) they WERE taken grossly out of context by morons and/or those with an anti-environment agenda. That the context argument was also used by Bible defenders is irrelevant. Crichton is way off ... By: TheTmantyla. on 19 Mar 12, 23:27:15 Crichton is way off base in his analysis of "religion." A religion can't be proven because it is ordered by fiat--its leaders say things are true, usually based on unprovable statements in an ancient tome, the content of which was cherry-picked by similar leaders over centuries. Science, on the other hand, is provable--and refutable if you have all the facts that fit a new theory to replace the old one. Environmentalism is based? on science. It is based on reality, not fantasy. Crichton's anti- ... By: TheTmantyla. on 19 Mar 12, 23:18:57 Crichton's anti-science anti-life rant: Environmentalism induces people to "make changes in their lifestyle" ...duh, if you're killing your grandchildren and the planet, DO IT! It "gives them? a total view of the world, in terms of how [it] is structured, what's right..." Certainly! BUT it's not "beliefs," it's science, facts, reality. Validated. Reviewed. That's not religion, it's common sense and SURVIVAL OF THE SPECIES. Crichton was a good mind enslaved to his conservative religion. So-called " ... By: TheTmantyla. on 19 Mar 12, 23:12:32 So-called "followers" of the environmental "religion??" WTF, is he a serious, arrogant, WRONG ass or what!! Environmentalism is based on 1) Science 2) Recognition that science has shown that overuse of chemicals and human impact on the ecology is damaging 3) This damage? is in many cases irreversible 4) It is morally wrong to impose our destruction on others, human or otherwise We changed our actions to fit the SCIENTIFIC facts and the conclusions: We are destroying our world and ourselves. @regresseur, unless ... By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 14 Mar 12, 01:23:03 @regresseur, unless you can prove that CO2 doesn't trap heat and that Man isn't raising CO2 levels far higher than nature could in modern times, you are just making stuff up to suit your agenda. You people act like all that melting ice means nothing! In other words, stick with the science or STFU. That applies to all of you who think you are smarter than people who actually do research on large-scale problems and give a damn about the future. You? only care about petty tax issues. @regresseur, so- ... By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 14 Mar 12, 01:18:33 @regresseur, so-called ClimateGate was a non-issue, based on taking language out of context in a tiny fraction of emails. The CRU was vindicated of wrongdoing by several panels. It's only natural for scientists to get annoyed when half-wits keep trying to tear down their evidence via cherry-picking and casting doubt where none really exists. Crichton was no hero. AGW is simply a physics issue, politicized by avarice. See "The Denial Machine" 2006 if you want to see some truly devious people. ? It's a "religion" ... By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 14 Mar 12, 01:13:30 It's a "religion" to respect the laws of physics that govern what's keeping you ALIVE, and to want to make sure it doesn't get altered (by Man) to where it threatens your LIFE? How bright was this guy, really? People who are so obsessed with being "controlled" that they ignore massive scientific evidence are? not well-rounded thinkers. They are zealots. Global warming deniers are typically anti-environmentalists, which puts the lie to claims of them merely "questioning the evidence." It's worse? than ... By: philWynk. on 10 Feb 12, 03:50:02 It's worse? than that, even. He wasn't negative at all about environmentalism; he was just analyzing it anthropologically. She took his correct analysis as criticism, because she thinks religion is necessary a very bad thing. Basically her question was a whine: "How can you say something so MEAN about something I really like?" She's such a True Believer that she can't even listen to objective analysis about herself without feeling attacked. I find it funny ... By: Casshyr. on 24 Jan 12, 20:09:29 I find it funny people? think Michael Crichton denies that humans are having a negative impact on the environment...he DOESN'T deny that! MC is only criticizing the methods in which we use to try to save the environment, which he argues isn't actually doing anything despite millions of dollars poured in. That's his criticism. If you ever bother to read State of Fear, he made it clear in the end: he acknowledges that environment is changing , and humans play a role in it. Substitute the word ... By: Entropy56. on 24 Jan 12, 01:12:26 Substitute the word, "Darwinism"? from "Environmentalism" and the story is the same. This guy is ... By: dannylikespoo1000. on 27 Nov 11, 16:24:46 This guy is entirely out of touch with what environmentalism is. crazy ramblings that no-one can learn ANYTHING FROM 2.00 Salvation? what the jeffrey is he on about? hey ho, we get the final laugh! Carry on with your eco-illiteracy you fucking yanks. wake up; everyone else in the? world cares about our environment, even if you dont. were doing our bit, so catch up. USA, in this respect at least, is behaving like a third world country. sort it, its embarassing fucking. genius. ... By: atimor. on 23 Nov 11, 00:31:25 fucking. genius. wow.? the last part was just, amazing Most of those ... By: JackyB92. on 22 Nov 11, 19:40:50 Most of those people there probably have never heard a dissenting view, I certainly didn't until I looked for the facts myself. To me, Michael Crichton articulates? exactly what modern environmentalism is and the more you look into it the more it looks like a religion. Excuse me, but are ... By: technatezin. on 21 Nov 11, 01:06:43 Excuse me, but are you out of your mind? Please tell me what I'm nugget of knowledge and wisdom am I suppose? to glean from your incoherent ramblings? It's interesting to ... By: drdarrow. on 19 Nov 11, 19:46:37 It's interesting to me how the ignorance of the female questioner is revealed in her loaded, naive question about? "his predjudice against environmentalism." It is clear that he is speaking against Environmentalism, and that his views are negative. But to believe one is demonstrating prejudice or *is* prejudiced because they have or express negative views or speak against something is to not understand that "pre-judging" (prejudice) is what we do without thinking. He clearly has mused on this. ya good point! but ... By: atimor. on 02 Nov 11, 23:06:08 ya good point! but he didn't need it :P environmentalism is so fundamentally religious that proving it to be a religion doesn't? even need its most religious aspect, thats when you know. catharsis = ... By: Sage80. on 01 Nov 11, 10:53:37 catharsis = watching crichton smack that bitch down, and keep his cool. I couldn't do that. I'd say, "are you actually claiming the moral & intellectual high ground against me?!" note also that while she impunes him for being "prejudiced"? against environmentalism, seh ignores the answer to her own question...BECAUSE it has become religious. is it a practical matter or a religious practice? ya,? she almost got ... By: Sage80. on 01 Nov 11, 10:49:04 ya,? she almost got Crichton to denounce his belief.

Free market environmentalism by Walter Block Part 1 Posted by: takadi Video duration: 500 seconds Global video hits: 14617 Walter Block at the Fraser Institute explaining the relationship between free market economics and environmentalism. Related: environmentalism, environment, walter, block, ron, paul, libertarianism, free, market, global, warming, pollution, fraser Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: i take it you buy ... By: streetz23. on 16 Apr 12, 18:40:55 i take it you buy into? the global warming propaganda? credible scientists from both sides are still debating the issue. I hate government ... By: CautionCU. on 16 Apr 12, 17:20:48 I hate government as? much as the next anarchist but this video is a crock of shit. i second? ... By: streetz23. on 14 Apr 12, 02:59:56 i second? breakingthe4thwall Someone explain to ... By: CautionCU. on 29 Mar 12, 01:32:40 Someone explain to me how the government does not allow me to sue for something when I can prove causation. This whole speech by Block is a crock of horseshit. If you look at the book he is selling here Rothbard says in the book that you have to show causation? in a libertarian state. Exactly what we have now, plus the EPA. It is not perfect but it is better than what Block proposes. Cause what Block proposes is lies and HORSESHIT. Thumbs up until someone sufficiently responds. Wow, when was this?? By: TomMullenTV. on 06 Mar 12, 22:45:31 Wow, when was this?? Anarchism is? a ... By: breakingthe4thwall. on 29 Nov 11, 23:24:52 Anarchism is? a form of libertarianism. This is? wonderful! By: hortulanus94. on 19 Nov 11, 07:33:15 This is? wonderful! @jackriter ... By: fountainherz. on 13 Nov 11, 02:11:35 @jackriter You're? an "anarcho"-communist that supports state subsidies and public ownership via statism (i.e. the political class own and control MoP/property). Fucking brilliant. @takadi? Well put, ... By: BrettDiercks. on 16 Jul 11, 04:43:37 @takadi? Well put, I agree with you on that. Also Libertarians in my experience understand politics or at least try very hard to understand them much more than Anarchist. You mean? after ... By: Trimbler00. on 09 Jun 11, 20:41:09 You mean? after this video? Because this is more of a minarchist argument. However ... By: takadi. on 28 May 11, 06:45:32 However libertarianism is the political translation of that and is espoused by realists (or at least as close as we can get to realists) who believe it is the best we can get to achieve maximum adherence to the non-aggression principle. It is fallacious to separate libertarianism and anarchy into two conflicting camps, and some extremely ardent anarchists even believe that they are mutually exclusive (can't tell you how many times I've seen libertarianism being called? a "statist" ideology) Also, if you desire ... By: takadi. on 28 May 11, 06:44:15 Also, if you desire a more in depth explanation, just read through? the comments and find my past posts. They were from a time where I had way more time on my hands and was much less lazy. Feel free to agree or disagree, but my basic premise is that anarchism resides in the philosophical realm and is espoused by dreamers and idealists Sorry I didn't ... By: takadi. on 28 May 11, 06:17:49 Sorry I didn't understand your post, it was quite strange and emotionally hysterical. I was simply explaining that anarchism is a goal but not a reality because perfect consistency can't be applied to a world where irrationality rules and pre-emptive appropriation is a dominant strategy and can sometimes even be perceived as pareto efficient (such as taxes where the perceived loss to the? individual is considered negligible by the individual) Rational perfection ... By: PoetsLight. on 27 May 11, 23:33:56 Rational perfection?? Are you high? How does rational perfection play into the picture of libertarianism. I'm looking forward to how you explain this (you probably can't). Every self- ... By: takadi. on 26 May 11, 16:47:37 Every self-described libertarian is a closet anarchist, the only difference? is that anarchists live in a dream world isolated by their ivory tower of non-aggression and rational perfection. Libertarians make anarchy a goal but know that it is virtually impossible in modern civilization Or in other words, ... By: PoetsLight. on 26 May 11, 05:26:57 Or in other words, Anarchism is? a political corollary of Libertarianism. If you accept the general arguments of Libertarian philosophy, then you logically arrive at Anarchism. Walter Block is simply a consistent Libertarian who has followed its implications to the necessary political conclusions. Libertarian minarchists such as Friedman are simply inconsistent. I guess you're ... By: PoetsLight. on 25 May 11, 03:56:25 I guess you're dumber than a 3rd grader because you've failed to "rip this 'intellectual argument' apart". I? would love to see you try. I need a good laugh. True story.? By: VforVoluntaryism. on 25 May 11, 02:27:12 True story.? Libertarianism is ... By: PoetsLight. on 19 May 11, 21:36:01 Libertarianism is defined as a philosophical body, where Anarchism is a political perspective.? Walter Block is both Libertarian and Anarchist. He argues for ... By: natechomnicorp. on 14 May 11, 02:23:12 He argues for government enforcement and creation of effective decent environmental protections; can't argue with that. He also argues that government has been subsidizing industry or the wrong industry, and that is also reasonable. I do not think however he has made a point against public ownership. Especially not addressed the advantages of the public maintaining ownership the land the Japanese are leasing as example or measures like Forest? Practices Code of British Columbia Act in 1994. That's what I meant ... By: erwinthehamsandwich. on 08 Mar 11, 00:46:21 That's what I meant. He's? an anarchist but he's still a libertarian. He didn't stop being a libertarian. Anarco-Capitalist? By: AdurianJ. on 07 Mar 11, 21:49:39 Anarco-Capitalist? Substitution: ... By: erwinthehamsandwich. on 13 Feb 11, 01:14:36 Substitution: Libertarianism-->Minarchism He's a libertarian anarchist.?

Crazy environmentalists mourn dead trees (now with annotations) Posted by: Golbezz1 Video duration: 107 seconds Global video hits: 32627 This is taking it a bit far... (now with annotations) lol Related: crazy, hippies, extreme, environmentalist, pyscho, odd, weird, cry, over, dead, trees, losers, no, friends Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: there r 20 billion ... By: rleecanemaster. on 20 May 12, 23:51:11 there r 20 billion more trees you can worship.? get over it!!! These hippies need ... By: UCSPanther20. on 05 May 12, 06:57:52 These hippies need to get the "Interfor" treatment. "We'll be seein'? ya real soon!" The whole ... By: ZaoHuZhua. on 11 Apr 12, 06:48:43 The whole population of the world can fit in the city of San Diego standing shoulder to shoulder... Pretty sure theres? enough breathing room. Let mother nature take its course. Is that? my teacher ... By: USA4thewin. on 09 Apr 12, 17:25:43 Is that? my teacher ? Those Yanks are ... By: AmericanMuscle881. on 08 Apr 12, 18:51:35 Those Yanks are crazy. You? don't see weird shit like this in the South. Merica! Good God please ... By: zooeyhall. on 07 Apr 12, 02:58:35 Good God please tell me this isn't for real! Either they? are putting on an act, or they are truly GONZO!!!! hahahah the scream ... By: asanrules. on 02 Apr 12, 22:25:24 hahahah the scream at 1:40 did? it for me lol i bet these people ... By: Time10am. on 12 Mar 12, 14:13:07 i bet these people go home made of wood from fallen trees but you dont here? them wailing. O by the way I want a million dollars but hear me complaining @kfriesen1979, ever ... By: Antithropocentric. on 12 Mar 12, 08:20:16 @kfriesen1979, ever heard of the Canadian tar sands? They may end up clearing boreal forests over an area the size of Florida in coming decades. There was also that massive lie by Rush Limbaugh about having more trees today than when the Constitution was written. He was off? by approx. 120 million acres, and I expect you've taken cues from his talking-points. Nothing is renewable if demand for it keeps growing. Endless population growth has consequences and "management" can only do so much. @kfriesen1979, why ... By: Antithropocentric. on 12 Mar 12, 08:13:14 @kfriesen1979, why is there ANY talk of logging old growth forest if your claim is true? Get real. Your claims can be debunked by studying maps at the? WRI Frontier Forests site, among other sources. You can't add 80 million people each year to a finite planet and not expect a net reduction in timber, overall. I notice you give a cutoff date of 40 years ago for your N.A. "more trees" claim, which is likely a cherry-picked figure, depending on geography. In the timber business, are you? You obviously don't ... By: kfriesen1979. on 11 Mar 12, 15:48:48 You obviously don't know anything about how modern logging works. There is no more clear cutting allowed and it's done in patches. It is in fact quite sustainable and will be more many more years to? come. There is actually more forest in North America than there was even 40 years ago. I know that mill that I work at has to replant for everything that they harvest, plus they pay huge stumpage fees, which helps to keep your taxes low. @kfriesen1979, ... By: Antithropocentric. on 09 Mar 12, 07:38:36 @kfriesen1979, human overpopulation and "economic growth" prevents many trees from growing back as fast as they are cut. That's the reason? old growth is under threat in the first place (it's self evident to biologists). Logging isn't sustainable when demand for wood keeps rising. I hope they? were ... By: epa316. on 09 Mar 12, 07:36:45 I hope they? were all sitting in poison oak This is a bit over ... By: Antithropocentric. on 09 Mar 12, 07:35:29 This is a bit over the top, but I'd rather mourn a tree than some greediot like Rush Limbaugh who has no respect for nature except as a money-source.? whoa uhhh your ... By: funnyblog100. on 04 Mar 12, 20:02:31 whoa uhhh your going to need? more then a theripist Fortunately, trees ... By: kfriesen1979. on 02 Mar 12, 04:55:30 Fortunately, trees can be regrown. Since the beginning of time, people have used wood for energy? and building material, it's not gonna' stop. There people? are ... By: js1112111. on 01 Mar 12, 01:11:24 There people? are all 3 miles beyond nuts....Funny though most people? dont ... By: bvpeaksandtrails. on 20 Feb 12, 23:55:46 most people? dont care untill the end then all the money and power wont bring the trees back I truly feel? there ... By: richton84. on 20 Feb 12, 18:35:12 I truly feel? there pain poor trees. O by the way I am selling firewood if anybody needs it. The media decided ... By: awsomeshow620. on 15 Feb 12, 03:18:53 The media decided to? film this?! I wonder who filmed ... By: awsomeshow620. on 15 Feb 12, 03:17:47 I wonder who filmed this,? some retard like them, or someone who was walking through the woods and thought it was hilarious and decided to put it on the internet. LOL!!!!! A moment of? ... By: lightonhands. on 11 Feb 12, 07:21:23 A moment of? silence trees Meanwhile, 10 ... By: chuckyko. on 03 Feb 12, 21:40:57 Meanwhile, 10 billion trees don't? give a fuck and couldn't possible care less what these lesbos are doing. And, yes, one tree yells STFU!!!! after that bizarre scream. The plants? and ... By: paul19781105. on 03 Feb 12, 21:04:10 The plants? and trees are screaming back "STFU!" no maaaaan they ... By: ChrisK513. on 18 Jan 12, 07:33:36 no maaaaan they live off? of pure oxygen.

Unlikely Skeptic: A Liberal Environmentalist challenges Global Warming Theory Posted by: cfact Video duration: 180 seconds Global video hits: 36741 Dr. Denis Rancourt speaks to Marc Morano on his views on the politics and science of global warming. "They look to comfortable lies" says Rancort with regard to global warming believers. Related: rancort, global warming, climate change, environmentalism, al gore, climate skeptic Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Yeah, the comments ... By: myownspiritlevel. on 26 Mar 12, 11:56:18 Yeah, the comments from the naturally occurring global warming deniers is typical and? totally expected. I'm sorry, no ... By: samtparry. on 30 Jan 12, 20:58:36 I'm sorry, no offense, but this video is lame. There are no specifics whatsoever. And this Denis Rancourt guy looks a little disturbed? based on his other YouTube videos. I really don't want to get too personal here, but if this is the best climate deniers can do, you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel. What does the world ... By: samtparry. on 30 Jan 12, 20:34:25 What does the world look like at 500ppm CO2 concentrations? Is it not warmer? If not, why not? If it's warmer, are we denying that there are likely to be some very substantial global changes? If the Arctic ice sheet, for instance, is already on a "death spiral" at 392ppm, what does that look like at 500+ppm? I'll grant? that no one can say for sure what the world will look like. But, we can also not say for sure that this isn't a gigantic experiment with very grave potential consequences. Its a bizarre issue ... By: BWCmike. on 23 Jan 12, 14:25:54 Its a bizarre issue in that there are special interests fighting on both sides. American capitalism has evolved to the state were financial interests will prevail over genuine scientific curiosity.? Its the unfortunate iron law of oligarchy. The true is ... By: mtnmanrab. on 24 Dec 11, 19:06:19 The true is fighting its way back.? Lets hope truth will win in the end. Thanks for posting this. Google "Some big ... By: DenisRancourt. on 04 Dec 11, 03:07:21 Google "Some big lies of science" for a great overview essay about? all of this and more... science is science, ... By: LaHistoriaOculta. on 01 Dec 11, 05:08:57 science is science, global? warming is just uncientific and taking atention away from the real enviormental problems we face. this scientific hoax is probably financed by oil owners who are also land owners. sure oil owners are desperate , but the evidence speaks for itself . co2 is you , when they say cut co2 down to cero , it means no more you , take a look at the georgia guidestones , maybe a new perspective will arrise , maybe not , this is just my opion (matanga69) You should read ... By: 2wheels88. on 21 Nov 11, 07:12:53 You should read this article :- Google Left-wing Env. Scientist Bails Out Of Global Warming Movement: Declares It A 'corrupt Social Phenomenon...strictly An Imaginary Problem Of The 1st World Middleclass' Posted July? 27th, 2010 at 5:02AM Marc Morano Climate Depot July 26, 2010 Who gives a f**** ... By: uros001. on 17 Nov 11, 17:48:29 Who gives a f**** about CO2 anyway. Nobody can stop the people from multiplying and turning the world into a lifeless dump. It's something like a 1000 maggots eating an apple. If the population of the world were only 10% of what it is and everyone had a normal(comfortable) standard of living the world would be a peacful and healthy place. But hey, birth control is a sin!? Economy rules! And we will spread to mars if needed so the economy can grow endlessly. Nothing can stop us, yay! Yeah same I am a ... By: 23lFrench. on 21 Jul 11, 19:22:17 Yeah same I am a Libertarian Socialist and against the idea of global warming. It is simple a loud of rubbish with scientists getting far to close to politicians with agendas. It annoys me that the left wing is getting into the climate change farce as much as they are. I want to seek the truth and I will continue to do so regardless of my? political view. I'm very left wing, ... By: spackhollogay. on 20 Jul 11, 11:41:18 I'm very left wing, and I think the idea that humans are causing Global Warming or climate change or whatever we're supposed to call it is ridiculous, and? just another excuse to tax us to the hilt. Post evidence the ... By: david52875. on 07 Jul 11, 21:05:03 Post evidence the earth's climate? in increasing faster than expected. What's happening to ... By: nellre. on 02 Jul 11, 16:05:19 What's happening to the ice? Believe your? eyes! Good lord. What a ... By: WideOfVision. on 14 May 11, 21:19:11 Good lord. What a bunch of dumb fucks. ? I love the responses... basically "no it's not." Like Doger481, who says there is "no" evidence when there is actually plenty and the only errors seem to be that the planet is now heating up faster than expected. But hey, just ask the corporations who are lining up to drill under the melting arctic... they certainly believe the planet is warming up. DoomHippie... just shut the fuck up, you don't know anything and only parrot other bullshit. Actual records also ... By: DoomHippie. on 14 May 11, 18:47:48 Actual records also lose? many cold-weather research facilities after the collapse of the Soviet Union. With the cold weather data being lost, we see a sharp increase in temperature that coincides with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the shut-down of Soviet climate research facilities. In fact, compare Gore's "hockey stick" chart to a chart of the number of Soviet research centers and you see a trend. Stop listening to rich, corporate special interests, do research. hey @Dodger... what ... By: jaxisbax. on 25 Mar 11, 21:22:13 hey @Dodger... what do you? do for a living? are you a physicist? or even an environmental scholar of any level? cuz im going to tend to believe someone who has actual education.. not someone who thinks they do cuz they are passionate about being a leftist follower... :) Brilliant. Yes why ... By: mrfuzzer1. on 12 Mar 11, 08:14:52 Brilliant. Yes why talk to the scientists when you can ask some kid off the streets.? @Dodger: Really? ... By: WideOfVision. on 28 Feb 11, 18:05:05 @Dodger: Really? That's odd because the actual records show a sharp increase that starts with the industrial revolution and 2010 tied for the? warmest year on record which is 2005. And that's just in the past FIVE years. But that's okay, I've learned that now amount of facts or actual evidence will convince people like you. You have have a brain disorder. Except the ... By: Dodger481. on 28 Feb 11, 08:31:31 Except the evidence? does not support any statistically signifigant warming for the past 15 years. Manmade Global warming is not happening and is not real Facts aren't ... By: isocrate27. on 20 Jan 11, 18:24:45 Facts aren't neutral. Anyone trying to say otherwise is lying to you or manipulating you. Max Weber has clearly demonstrated there are only interpreted facts not facts per se. Debates occur between a clash of two or more interpretations not between facts. Nature scientists are generally unaware of their own scientist ideology which make them believe they speak on behalf of the Truth. Nature scientists? should start reading social scientists and philosophers. " Global Climate is ... By: narayananraveen. on 06 Jan 11, 11:42:54 " Global Climate is Changing NOT because of SU N OR? CO2. MANY Iceshelves collapsed during WINTER. FOR more information Welcome to visit Sarva Kala Vallabhan Group in facebook & comment " Good lord. What a ... By: WideOfVision. on 04 Jan 11, 18:06:13 Good lord. What a joke. It's like a watching a mildly retarded child continue to jam square pegs into round holes. Marc Moran is just a hack for oil and mine interests since his PR website it just a product of Exxonmobil funding. There is nothing to support the the idea that Rancourt is a left wing environmentalist. The essay, not? a research paper, was written in 2007. It's now 2011 and the science between now and then only supports further warming. 30 years ago the ... By: ProjectRedPill1. on 26 Nov 10, 00:53:40 30 years ago the science said we were heading for global cooling. Power hungry opportunists couldn't hold the general public financially responsible for that? though, could they? With record-breaking freezing temperatures already this year, along with the recent evidence exposing many climate scientists as liars, who do you think should ultimately be "discredited"? I wouldn't trust Wikipedia as far as I could throw the bunch of toadies who control its content. So instead of ... By: rugbyguy59. on 08 Nov 10, 01:17:45 So instead of listening to? environmentalists why don't we listen to the scientists. There are skeptical scientists. If AGW is so easy to disprove than they should produce a paper or two that refutes it. Despite the big lie that people are "bailing out" on global warming the consensus and evidence for AGW gets stronger and stronger. And if I shouldn't listen to environmentalists, as deniers keep telling me, why would I listen to this one.

Free market environmentalism by Walter Block Part 2 Posted by: takadi Video duration: 519 seconds Global video hits: 4339 Walter Block at the Fraser Institute explaining the relationship between free market economics and environmentalism. Related: environmentalism, environment, walter, block, ron, paul, libertarianism, free, market, global, warming, pollution, green Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Is Professor Block ... By: OrganicTory. on 12 Dec 10, 00:51:00 Is Professor Block proposing a form of 'cap-and-trade' with his recommendation that capitalists buy pollution credits, and that the more successful? entrepreneurs will be producing more per credit, with less successful businesses unable to compete for the limited pollution credits? This appears to be the case, but cap-and-trade has received such opprobrium that I'm a bit hesitant to equate Block's proposal with c-&-t. The problem with? ... By: TheLegalImmigrant05. on 20 Aug 10, 15:46:42 The problem with? his argument (and I'm surprised he is even making it) is that the decision making process to determine the "scientifically correct" amount of pollution will absolutely be corrupted. In fact, it has been (see Climategate). I wonder if he would advocate carbon trading schemes today. In fact, this part of his argument is NOT rooted in property rights at all. i love how the ... By: sdcair. on 22 Mar 10, 22:45:53 i love how the interview gets convinced,? haha! Well, the amount of ... By: JETZcorp. on 15 Mar 10, 00:25:23 Well, the amount of CO2 the human population breathes is about 9% of the amount released by humans through other means. Of those "other means," cars make up 22%. So clearly, breathing isn't as bad as traffic, but it's not a trivial amount of CO2. Now of course, the carbon that one breathes had to be taken out of the atmosphere by some plant or animal which you? then ate, which makes breathing carbon-neutral, unlike cars. Algae-based fuel would put the cars on par with breathing in this way. I am luvin this guy ... By: madscirat. on 13 Jan 10, 02:30:33 I am luvin this guy, great post. His point about the forest land was illuminating. I? used to work in public forests and I always wondered why they were clearcut so badly and so frequently. This interviewer ... By: Hashishin13. on 14 Nov 09, 00:21:58 This interviewer seems a little empty headed.? Good points apart ... By: Stormwern. on 24 Oct 09, 20:35:00 Good points apart from the flub? on "breathing pollution" Well, if Hooker ... By: DarthKazi. on 22 Jun 09, 04:10:04 Well, if Hooker Chemical was still around and making profits, etc... "bimmjim" might have a point. But when companies engage in bad practices or do wasteful, inefficient things, they fail. Sure, damage was done, but it's not wholly indicative of markets and private owned projects. But when government wastes and engages in market manipulation, it still stays in business because the coins and paper? say, "In God We Trust". Apparently, "The State" is only answerable to "God". *sigh* I find it strange ... By: 11mc22. on 21 Jun 09, 19:42:08 I find it strange how many people think that government is the solution to government problems. The thing is, Government is the biggest polluters in the world! They subsidize projects that would otherwise be unprofitable such as constantly buying new property for logging or mining. Liberals then say it is the free market thats the problem and somehow putting forth more regulation and wasting more tax payer's money? is the solution. Look what happened ... By: DarthKazi. on 21 Jun 09, 18:56:03 Look what happened to Hooker. Obviously, any suggestion to a problem isn't? perfect and there are always exceptions and bad apples. If Block is wrong, why don't you propose a solution, instead of spouting indignation. Do you think more "Big Brother" tax-payer "solutions" are the answer? Hooker DID know the ... By: 11mc22. on 05 Jun 09, 19:58:43 Hooker DID know the dangers in fact they WARNED the government not to build to school there It was? the government that used Eminent Domain and built that school there even though Hooker tried to avoid this happening Hooker, being a ... By: bimmjim. on 05 Jun 09, 18:23:20 Hooker, being a chemical company should have known the dangers. I worked in various industries doing materials science so I was either regulating or being regulated. I know the reality of regulation whether it is environmental, product safety or worker safety. Although I am now retired I continue to do this type of work for free. Check out? the link on my youtube page. In capitalism there is the concept of competition on a level playing field. The field is made of taxes and regulation. bimmjim no Hooker ... By: 11mc22. on 05 Jun 09, 04:59:41 bimmjim no Hooker chemical warned the government not the build the school there. Hooker made? sure that their pollution did not end up on anyone else's property however the government used Eminent Domain and took that land to build a school. In the end the company was the one to take the blame but most environmentalists use the love canal tragedy to justify more government involvement Politicians should ... By: rayyf69. on 24 May 09, 06:56:59 Politicians should not? reject lobbyists it's in their best interest to gain campaign contributions. This is why your ideological system breaks down. It relies on the beneficence of a small group of people to work. People are not angels. Haha, I like Block ... By: StrafingMoose. on 16 May 09, 03:00:55 Haha, I like Block but? indeed, awful joke. That doesn't make ... By: StrafingMoose. on 16 May 09, 02:52:36 That doesn't make Block wrong.? He's not saying such a private property system will PREVENT ANY such occurence, but rather set the incentives to not do such things. on wikipedia it ... By: stealthswimmer. on 19 Apr 09, 08:47:26 on wikipedia it says that the city allowed stuff to be built over that land. So in the case of the chemical company, they probably figured they had to put the waste somewhere.... anyways, i barely started reading, but looks like a) the chemical company didn't say they had dumped waste there when they sold the land? (that's fraud and there's supposed to be legal action against that) or b) the city DID know about the waste and figured they should build there anyways without letting people know Search "love canal" ... By: bimmjim. on 13 Mar 09, 02:15:30 Search "love canal" to see what Hooker Chemical did to its land. Why did the executives at Hooker not behave as Block says they should or would? It's because Block is wrong and? there are many more examples. Very interesting ... By: milfrie. on 01 Mar 09, 17:16:10 Very interesting video.. my? husband is a scientist in agricultural ecology and found this insightful since we are conservative/libertarians. There is at least ... By: bimmjim. on 16 Jan 09, 21:44:28 There is at least one problem with his little theory on air polution. It is all based on the science? and the science is corrupt and corruptable. I did that kind of science for a living and now I do it for free. This is how I know. Please go to the hot link under my avatar on my u-tube page. Read the captions. If you require any more proof just contact me. To bad you didn't ... By: r3dredwine. on 14 Dec 08, 12:33:02 To bad you didn't listen to anything he's saying about buying pollution rights and privatizing waste companies. Besides if they pollute or affect my land in anyway, I will sue and own the the greenest dairy/steak farm? in the world :) wait free market ... By: McOath. on 09 Dec 08, 22:39:42 wait free market doesn't mean those with more moeny making more money, that seems to be how it's always worked. Also all the stuff about cows, cows and dairy/steak farming are some of the biggest polluters in the world that's? the industry destroying the Amazon, just because cows aren't close to being extinct doesn't mean the enviroment has won by letting people own them. That? joke was ... By: ithinkronpaulissmart. on 09 May 08, 07:02:25 That? joke was terrible. Google "CASSE"? to ... By: bimmjim. on 29 Apr 08, 22:10:18 Google "CASSE"? to learn how we must change our economic systems.

Dr Robert Nelson: Environmentalism as Religion - From Freedomain Radio Posted by: stefbot Video duration: 2879 seconds Global video hits: 5823 Podcast: www.fdrurl.com Dr Nelson's books: www.fdrurl.com Dr Robert Nelson of the University of Maryland argues that environmentalism is a modern form of religion. From Freedomain Radio, the largest and most popular philosophy show on the web... www.freedomainradio. com Related: dr, robert, nelson, environmentalism, religion, marxism, calvin, catholic, protestant Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: No, it's not. It's ... By: mopctranslations. on 20 May 12, 10:37:07 No, it's not. It's not about whether the Science behind Environmentalism,? but how you ideologically manipulate it. Interesting topic ... By: lefty6584. on 05 Dec 11, 17:18:27 Interesting topic but Dr. Nelson? needs to get to the point more quickly totally mindblowing ... By: xsickzackx. on 03 Dec 11, 09:56:00 totally mindblowing.. just astonishing the parallels? I? feel like I ... By: Xtro2005. on 08 Sep 11, 21:40:50 I? feel like I should be seeming more in these widescreen interviews. This is? a good ... By: qtutoringhelps. on 20 Jun 11, 21:18:34 This is? a good interview. Strange how i'm ... By: MikeAlexanderNewell. on 04 Jun 11, 23:15:58 Strange how i'm listening to a radio broardcast based on? Environmentalism as a religion and couldn't help but notice above which states "666 videos". 1. rational ... By: loodlebugger. on 08 May 11, 16:20:06 1. rational conclusion to recognition of finite resources - limit resource use/ use resources with care. Nothing religious there. 2. Golden age for environmentalists? No. Not amongst any that I know. See Lovelock: human agents didn't deliberately take the path of major negative impact; they reacted. We now have the? tools to avoid (perhaps. It's a moot point). Not by the imposition of a dictated set of rules, but only by eliciting a different attitude. Pity you oversimplify. 1. rational ... By: loodlebugger. on 08 May 11, 16:19:15 1. rational conclusion to recognition of finite resources - limit resource use/ use resources? with care. Nothing religious there. 2. Golden age for environmentalists? No. Not amongst any that I know. See Lovelock: human agents didn't deliberately take the path of major negative impact; they reacted. We now have the tools to avoid (perhaps. It's a moot point). Not by the imposition of a dictated set of rules, but only by eliciting a different attitude. Pity you oversimplify. 1. rational ... By: loodlebugger. on 08 May 11, 16:18:37 1. rational conclusion to recognition of finite resources - limit resource use/ use resources with care. Nothing religious there. 2. Golden age for environmentalists? No. Not amongst any that I know. See Lovelock: human agents didn't deliberately take the path of major negative impact; they reacted. We now have the tools to avoid (perhaps. It's a moot point). Not by the imposition of a dictated set of rules,? but only by eliciting a different attitude. Pity you oversimplify. Mother Nature is a ... By: JRD123456. on 08 Feb 11, 23:01:36 Mother Nature is a dictatorship....just saying, but I? do agree. What? was at isue ... By: Hashishin13. on 23 Jan 11, 02:05:45 What? was at isue heere is that most of the environementalists are socialist totalitarians. I really don't understand what you mean when you say: "Honestly that polarized metaphor indicates much more religious thinking than environmentalism." I'm not religious, and I do care about the environment, so what are you trying to say? My first comment was pointing out that you were whining about something which just isn't true, most environmentalists, academic or otherwise advocate totalitarian controls Well we're not ... By: secrets0stolen. on 22 Jan 11, 19:02:02 Well we're not dealing with color here. We're dealing with issues, and ways to address them. Honestly that polarized metaphor indicates much more religious thinking? than environmentalism. If something is 90% ... By: Hashishin13. on 15 Jan 11, 03:52:16 If something is 90% black and 10% white it's easier to? just call it black, or at least "dark". Yea we all want a ... By: Hashishin13. on 15 Jan 11, 03:50:55 Yea we all want a nice place to live and be, and peace on earth and blah blah. The problem with environmentalism is the HOW, which always seems to be either whining about this or that, or? getting the government to tax, regulate or otherwise infringe on people's liberty. Read a book about ... By: SebSurfer02. on 02 Jan 11, 22:05:51 Read a book about sustainability and the u know the how en what on choices of environmentalists. Alot of to much interpertation on this subjects of these guys. Its not rocket science? guys. (except climate change, nobody knows that for sure) Environmentalism; ... By: cautionhumanbeing. on 15 Dec 10, 13:04:01 Environmentalism; not researching your religious beliefs, not interested in becoming a religion, not interested in dictatorship, not interested in being dictated to, not interested in oppression, not interested in violence. Is interested in; conscious living,..common sense. Environmentalism is based on the idea of living in a sensible healthy way on this planet and not destroying it. Period. Greed has been a destructive force as long as humanity has been in existence. We all know? that. Environmentalism is ... By: cautionhumanbeing. on 15 Dec 10, 12:57:12 Environmentalism is; not researching your religious beliefs not interested in becoming a religion not interested in dictatorship not interested in being dictated to not interested in? oppression not interested in violence It is interested in; conscious living respect compassion understanding knowledge spreading awareness harmony Environmentalism is based on the idea of living in a kindly healthy way on this planet and not destroying it. Period. I don't always ... By: rgrannell1. on 13 Dec 10, 16:46:26 I don't always agree with what Stephan thinks, and there is obviously a good degree of validity to the environmentalists claims, but it's clearly visible that there are parallels between the environmentalist lobbies and unthinking? religious movements 21st Century ... By: robbierevenant. on 06 Dec 10, 19:09:50 21st Century Millenarism? Isn't this ... By: secrets0stolen. on 02 Dec 10, 03:39:46 Isn't this essentially argument ad hominem? Dismiss environmentalists as simply filling a psychological need when you are not? presenting an argument against it? You say that all environmentalists want to do is increase government power, and this is largely true for mainstream academic environmentalists who don't want to challenge the status quo too much. But it misrepresents a number (who also identify as environmentalists) of dedicated people with legitimate vital concerns! Also he's wrong ... By: IndrasBlade77. on 21 Oct 10, 23:13:34 Also he's wrong that a few degrees will change ecology. It won't. Besides, empirical data proves it will be no? more than 1 degree per hundred years and will actually probably decline into the next minimum. Consciousness is ... By: IndrasBlade77. on 21 Oct 10, 22:17:00 Consciousness is separate from the material components. It's still unexplained. Not to mention the initial? conditions of the universe being unexplained. Life is designed to arise. It is a religion ... By: IndrasBlade77. on 21 Oct 10, 22:15:08 It is a religion because it's entirely Faith-based. There is ZERO evidence for it. man made global warming problem, it's a SCAM! There is zero evidence for it ZERO! It's merely a scam to set up a global governance over all our lives, to collapse economies thus destroying resistance to the global government, and to rake in trillions for the bankers? and corporations. Not to mention the? proponents of it are alarmist, nasty religious cultists. You're missing the ... By: IndrasBlade77. on 21 Oct 10, 22:12:36 You're missing the point completely. There is no man made global warming problem, it's a SCAM! There is zero evidence for it ZERO! It's merely a scam to set up a global governance over all our lives, to collapse economies thus destroying resistance to the global government, and? to rake in trillions for the bankers and corporations.

Joel Salatin - Christian, Libertarian, Environmentalist, Capitalist Farmer Posted by: eartheats Video duration: 196 seconds Global video hits: 3102 Joel Salatin describes himself as a "Christian, libertarian, environmentalist, capitalist farmer." Earth Eats Host Annie Corrigan asks him to break those labels down and define what they mean to him. More videos, podcasts and recipes on our website: eartheats.org Related: joel salatin, polyface farm, environmentalism, farming, agriculture, food Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Joel you inspire ... By: hortulanus94. on 06 Jan 12, 09:48:50 Joel you inspire me? so much! Joel I want to grow ... By: franciscodudeful. on 26 Sep 11, 15:37:38 Joel I want to grow older like you. Thank you so much man and? may GOD bless you many years to come. Search on youtube ... By: bayheadmedia. on 01 Jul 11, 17:40:13 Search on youtube for Why We Fight in Under 6 Minutes. The Real cost of? Endless War. Ron Paul 2012 I? completely agree ... By: grba228. on 31 Mar 11, 22:42:22 I? completely agree with all that Joel said in that video! I sure hope you ... By: dodgecowboy65. on 24 Jan 11, 16:52:14 I sure hope you don't apologize for making a profit. A lot of farmers used to be able to do that, but unlike you they did not change their way of doing things, so they lost out as they became the dinosaur that is being propped up by Monsanto now to grow food that is killing? us. More power to the small farmer that is willing to take the risk to feed his family as sell extra for a profit. Exodus 21:20-21, ... By: qwertypoiu4321. on 03 Oct 10, 23:38:31 Exodus 21:20-21, KJV: "And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die? under his hand; he shall be surely punished. Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money." Agree!? By: jgalvanatx. on 01 Sep 10, 04:02:01 Agree!? Genius!? By: boop1972. on 08 Mar 10, 22:35:03 Genius!? your the? man Joel! By: hisblood27. on 29 Jan 10, 15:18:50 your the? man Joel!

Free market environmentalism by Walter Block Part 3 Posted by: takadi Video duration: 565 seconds Global video hits: 3206 Walter Block at the Fraser Institute explaining the relationship between free market economics and environmentalism. Related: environmentalism, environment, walter, block, ron, paul, libertarianism, free, market, global, warming, pollution, green Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: @takadi: Karl Marx? ... By: Akatam0t0ma. on 24 Apr 11, 19:32:56 @takadi: Karl Marx? gave him a revelation in a dream, and said that it is so, so who are you to doubt Karl Marx's infinite wisdom, you racist social darwinist capitalist pig? I think an ... By: JETZcorp. on 15 Mar 10, 00:41:05 I think an insurance company would make a killing on nuclear power. Considering that the worst nuclear disaster in American history led to zero cases of death and illness, I don't see why the insurance company would have to pay all that much. Meanwhile, XYZ Nuclear Insurance would be collecting payments from plants that are going along just fine. Given that? 40,000 people die on the roads each year, I would think car insurance would have far more potential for going bust. Humans are a ... By: bimmjim. on 29 Jan 10, 23:21:18 Humans are a gregarious animal and therefore evolve as a group. It is the genome of the group that is most important. According to evolution theory, most interactions between individual humans? should be cooperative rather than competitive. See The Prisoner Game from the mathematics of game theory and apply it to the evolution of gregarious animals. Darwinian natural ... By: madscirat. on 15 Jan 10, 16:26:52 Darwinian natural selection and economics are the exact same algorythm operating on different systems. People don't like Darwinism being brandished about bc/ some really nasty folks have used it in the past to justify inhuman acts, but? that by itself doesn't negate the comparison. Also why on youtube do people use some variant of the "i have studied" argument.I have studied it also, I just dont think that fact has any bearing on an argument, tho perhaps this is because I also studied logic. Lobbying is just ... By: bimmjim. on 14 Jan 10, 20:22:39 Lobbying is just advertising. If we elect better politicians, they would outlaw lobbying. It has happened.? Look for better examples around the world. I agree with capitalism because it has feed back loops but I wish economists would stop using their missunderstanding of evolution to justify their economic theories. I have studied real biology and your allussion to Darwinian natural selection is inappropriate. Regulation is not ... By: madscirat. on 13 Jan 10, 02:43:54 Regulation is not unbiased, let me explain. Polluting industry -->lobbiest --> politician ---> Regulatory Law -->pollution. If you doubt the power of industry to influence law see the current health care legislation. My point is if you want unbiased regulation then, the only unbiased regulator is the free market, just as the only unbiased regulator in nature is Darwinian natural selection. And the great thing about both these forms of regulation is that they employ zero lawyers? : ) yes; corporatism, ... By: Estevinyo. on 26 Oct 09, 19:08:01 yes; corporatism, central banking, inflationism, "mixed economy" welfarism and endless spending will decrease? our standard of living and cannot last. The reason some ... By: Stormwern. on 24 Oct 09, 20:54:59 The reason some services are made municipal is that they are impossible to run with a profit in certain areas. In very sparsely populated areas the cost of? collection would be enormous, and it is also easier there to throw garbage in the woods somewhere without getting caught. What do you think would happen? Nuclear power can't be ensured because any insurance company would instantly go bankrupt if there was a serious incident. What we have now is ... By: bimmjim. on 28 Sep 09, 20:41:00 What we have now is capitalism with regulation. I think that capitalism with regulation is the best system we have yet invented however Block's ideas on regulation are absurd because he has no knowledge of science. I am educated in engineering and I did some regulating? in industry. I experienced the reality of regulating. You can click the links on my page. I do not understand ... By: takadi. on 25 Sep 09, 08:54:21 I do not understand how you can conflate the system Walter Block is? advocating with our current system. This video was made ... By: bimmjim. on 24 Sep 09, 22:33:33 This video was made before the? recent economic collapse. It is now obvious that our current economic model cannot last. This model will continue to cause decreasing standards of living all over the world. Walter block makes ... By: 11mc22. on 05 Jun 09, 05:10:20 Walter block makes some very? good points The higher the ... By: rayyf69. on 31 May 09, 01:35:09 The higher the profit of those 5 firms the greater the incentive of? new firms to enter the market. Unless government intervenes to provide monopoly protection to the 5 firms(via regulation, taxation,union policy) entrepreneur's will , through self interest, seek to capitalize on this market by competing. If we, the human ... By: bimmjim. on 12 May 09, 19:37:06 If we, the human species, do not? choose to live at a sustainable level then a level, not to our liking, will be imposed upon us. "The plastic bag ... By: NSResponder. on 12 May 09, 08:00:34 "The plastic bag problem is miniscule " And when did he say that the plastic bag problem was the biggest problem of its kind?? Oh, wait: he didn't. It's an illustrative example. Got any more straw men you want to flog? -jcr Did you watch? the ... By: VoluntaryGov. on 26 Apr 09, 21:32:58 Did you watch? the previous parts of the video? so then I guess the ... By: stealthswimmer. on 22 Apr 09, 05:29:56 so then I guess the O2 let off by increased plant growth is offset by the increased? CO2 (which is the one I hear about all the time when fossil fuels are burned). Look, I ain't an expert in the field, lol....and for that matter, why should i bother doin all that stuff you do? That's time I could spend doin somethin more fun. :D Oh? stealthswimmer: ... By: bimmjim. on 20 Apr 09, 20:31:33 Oh? stealthswimmer: Why do I bother? I carefully chose the term fosil carbon for a reason but there just isn't enough room here to explain. You should go to university and study the chemistry of carbon as I have. Then get a job doing mathematical modeling as I have. Then maybe you will understand that the scientists who are doing computer modeling of the atmosphere and who are saying that global warming is happening are correct. turns out increased ... By: stealthswimmer. on 19 Apr 09, 08:51:50 turns out increased CO2 gas helps crop yields and plant growth. Other gas pollutants are worse(they "dirty" they air AND don't lend to much use), but? for some reason we keep hearing that CO2 is the problem, lol. There are other carbon-containing gases that lead to problems. Folks gotta realize that "carbon emissions" is too broad. We need to be more specific cus that could mean ANYTHING with carbon in it. Gawd, Blockhead ... By: reforest4fertility. on 05 Feb 09, 05:28:39 Gawd, Blockhead wrote Economics & Enviro Reconcil'n. That's the way to beat the? left to their own punch & bend the truth to lie back at us folk, ugh. A note on overpop. Where we have universal edu (partic. of women) & healthcare we've also low infant mortality & slowed death rate ='ing neg. pop. growth. Where the heaviest military assaults & occupations & neoliberal econ. impositions we have high inf. mort & birthrates outstripping the high death rates. Contrast Sweden with Gaza, 4 instance. This guy has no ... By: bimmjim. on 16 Jan 09, 21:58:46 This guy has no perspective. The plastic bag problem is miniscule compared to the bigger environmental problems. The average shopper uses 10 times as much fosil carbon to drive to the store than is used to make the bags. And there is even more fosil carbon, in the form of coal, burned to supply the shoper with electricity. I will now demonstrate some perspective. The bigger environmental problems are global warming, loss of biodiversity, the increasing levels of toxins in us and overpopulaton? We should probably ... By: passerby23. on 19 Dec 08, 01:26:27 We should probably engage in private as I can expand in more detail than concise one paragraph answers. Monopoly capitalism, to me, is really not capitalism at all, but fascism. That? IS tyrannical. A free market has no power structure, it doesn't exclude competition, it doesn't accrue rights to some and not others. Workers produce things, yes, but they agree to work for those wages. If they want more, they can produce things themselves. The employer provides capital, jobs, and takes on risk. Corporatism as it ... By: passerby23. on 19 Dec 08, 01:22:28 Corporatism as it stands now with monopoly control and government collusion is very bad. But, it's the anarcho-syndicalists who confuse our current mess with free? market capitalism. Corporations in and of themselves are not bad, it's what the law has allowed them to do. And who writes the laws? Investors are not paid for their productivity since they aren't exchanging labor for money. They are making an agreement to exchange money for capital investment, which creates productivity. ok I apologize I ... By: McOath. on 19 Dec 08, 00:58:12 ok I apologize I was rhetorically incorrect productivity is important. Fair wages, this ultimately comes down to the labour theory of value, and seeing corperatism as coercive, which you obviously don't. But why is it fair that investors,? etc. are paid niether for productivity nor effort, the workers produce things, yet others get paid for it. The simple solution seems to me to be worker-cooperative (syndicalist) industry. what's so scary about that? how does capitalism not lead to tyranny?

Free market environmentalism by Walter Block Part 4 Posted by: takadi Video duration: 545 seconds Global video hits: 2672 Walter Block at the Fraser Institute explaining the relationship between free market economics and environmentalism. Related: environmentalism, environment, walter, block, ron, paul, libertarianism, free, market, global, warming, pollution, green Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: The company that ... By: bimmjim. on 26 Oct 09, 20:20:54 The company that owned the land originally made its profit when it sold the land to the dummy company. The dummy company was created to fail by the original owner of the land. It's a trick.? Things are not what they seem to be. Now the damage is done and the land is useless. "Then the dummy ... By: Nellsing. on 25 Oct 09, 00:28:48 "Then the dummy company went? bankrupt." Precisely? Doesn't actually contradict what Walter Block says. The bit about ... By: Stormwern. on 24 Oct 09, 21:54:40 The bit about funding being cut from institutions going under budget etc is a gross oversimplification. Mom's a principal, trust me, going under budget doesn't happen and going over budget is a lot more likely to get? you fired than anything else. Block? says that ... By: bimmjim. on 22 Oct 09, 20:09:56 Block? says that the logging companies will take better care of the forest if they own it. This statement is easily disproven. See the link to photobucket on my youtube page for PROOF. Bimmjim, you are ... By: 123ziran. on 09 Sep 09, 09:48:24 Bimmjim, you are right. Campfire and the risk for the public asset must be limit or paid for. Individuals who benifit from the public asset need to follow certain rules to? protect public asset. For example we need ... By: 123ziran. on 09 Sep 09, 09:35:35 For example we need to have free public access to the earth atmosphere. However, we must not forget to charge anyone who damages it. There is no reason to privatise the earth atmosphere, the key here is a proper accounting of the environmental cost of the air pollution, and let the polluters pay. We do not need someone who charges everyone on? earth who breathe, but if we allow everyone pollute the air for free we are committing slow suicide. The idea situation ... By: 123ziran. on 09 Sep 09, 09:33:24 The idea situation is free pubic access and charge on environmental cost.? It does not matter who owns the land. If you restrict public access you reduce public good. But if you fail to charge on environmental cost, the public will ruin the asset. The key is a proper accounting of environmental cost. What he is advocating is market is the best the price setting mechanism for environment cost. Government = ... By: rayyf69. on 07 May 09, 00:42:04 Government = benevolent angels, unlimited care and compassion for their assets Private individuals = selfish insidious agents who destroy and waste their assets. This is a very? useful formula, but false i believe. You really don't ... By: VoluntaryGov. on 26 Apr 09, 21:41:11 You really don't understand what? he is talking about, do you? Yo Folks, we need a ... By: reforest4fertility. on 18 Jan 09, 07:04:49 Yo Folks, we need a peoples' version of the Fraser Institute. The CCPA (search it) doesn't seem to be cutting it, countering it, adequately. This? vid is a direct insult, assault on the public mind. The woman interviewer agrees with everything this deliberately sinister Blockhead says, as every point he makes is wrong, tho lords it over so it "must be" right. I know he knows better. Then he says, "now I'll tell you some more radical things". Ya radical in going 2 the core of core-pirate interests He is talking about ... By: bimmjim. on 16 Jan 09, 22:30:38 He is talking about B.C. Canada where I also live. His hypothetical model of the socioeconomic system is disproved by the evidence. In my neighbourhood a logging company flipped some private land through 4 companies and then finally into the hands of a dummy company which logged it flat. Then the dummy company went bankrupt.? For evidence, click on the hot link on my page. ".....you sell too ... By: OctoBox. on 29 Sep 08, 01:24:18 ".....you sell too many Etsels and you go the way of the? Desoto" - HAHAHAHAHAHA cmbradford: The ... By: bimmjim. on 13 Aug 08, 21:14:54 cmbradford: The points you make are not relavent. We live in complex societies which require laws. Sometimes I can't have a campfire in the forest because? there is a danger that I might cause a forest fire. I understand the need for such a law and I comply with it. I have rules on my own property: for example I ask that anyone coming to visit me should bring no illegal drugs or weapons onto my property. If I am being unreasonable, explain how. So basically my ... By: cmbradford. on 07 Aug 08, 20:56:35 So basically my friend discovered that he needs to fill out all this paper work and be searched by government officials in order to use this public land. ? Not so public after all, and trust me, the government tells him what to do. In fact, he is trying to survival for a couple of months but the park rangers won't allow him to make a camp fire... So just keep on telling yourself that you control the government. It is funny that ... By: cmbradford. on 07 Aug 08, 20:54:47 It is funny that you mention camping and hiking, etc. because my friend who loves the wilderness recently went on a 3 month camping trip in a national park or one of your public lands. Since he has been up there, he has been? harassed by park rangers that he doesn't have a permit to stay out in the "public" forest. Reminds me of the King's forest and how you need permission to use it. The concept of public land isn't as freely open to the public as one might assume. I use police cars ... By: bimmjim. on 18 Jun 08, 20:57:08 I use police cars for their intended purpose. Eg A drunken bum smashes his car into my front yard. I call the cops. They arrive in? their(my) police car. They catch the idiot. I recover my loss. I have been using my public land for over 50 years. Here is a list of what I have used it for: hiking, camping, kyaking, hunting, fishing, berry picking, gathering fire wood, dirt bike riding, swimming, spelunking, climbing, photographing etc. It is my land and I will tell the Gov. what to do. Sure...just like ... By: cmbradford. on 15 Jun 08, 08:36:21 Sure...just like every police car is "public" property aka your property. ? Try using that for your own interests. Just because it is "public" doesn't mean that you will have any right to use it. It most cases you won't be able to use this public land. Block is talking ... By: bimmjim. on 29 Apr 08, 22:20:20 Block is talking about Canada. When he says that the government owns 90% of the land, he is wrong. That land is public land. I am one of the public in Canada. I OWN THAT LAND. GET YOUR HANDS OFF IT BLOCK. Please? google "CASSE" and learn more. We must change our economic systems. It was the first ... By: yahooshua. on 22 Apr 08, 23:22:41 It was the first mate that was at? the wheel. The captain probably was asleep because it was his time to sleep. Maybe I'm wrong ... By: passerby23. on 20 Apr 08, 23:48:15 Maybe I'm wrong about this, but I don't think that's what Block was saying. He was saying the reason the captain was hired on in? the first place was because of the alcohol disability laws that mandate their hiring. Also, was he asleep because he was drunk or just tired? The fact that an inept captain was sleeping paving the way for a sleep deprived first mate is precisely the problem Blcok is speaking of. At least, that's how I interpreted it. haha yeah, he did a ... By: MartinFarrows. on 20 Jan 08, 13:37:46 haha yeah, he did a great job. It's not usual to? be so succesful at convincing the interviewer like he did. You can't really be ... By: takadi. on 14 Jan 08, 18:46:54 You can't really be perfect in a free market society, and Walter recognizes that. The difference though is that a socialist or corporatist society inadvertently (or sometimes purposely) props up those corrupt systems? where these scumbags can exist. Bayer's screw up had to do with the failure of the FDA. In a true free market, consumer investigations and reports would be a major force in the market. i agree with a lot ... By: richard911truth. on 12 Jan 08, 23:15:32 i agree with a lot he has to say, but remeber bayer and factor 8? that was fully free market and they were really scumbags for doing? that whole deal. Knowing it was tainted then selling it overseas so they could profit. Thanks for that? ... By: takadi. on 10 Jan 08, 04:32:29 Thanks for that? correction He is actually ... By: yahooshua. on 08 Jan 08, 10:07:49 He is actually incorrect about Exxon. After everything was? said in done the Captains alcohol problem actually had nothing to do with it because he was asleep and not in charge of the ship at the time. It was actually his first mate who was severely sleep deprived that fell asleep at the wheel. That never got on the media because the story was old not NEWs. But he still correct. They should have a MWT (Maintenance of Wakefulness Test). Which is becoming standard for pilots.

Free market environmentalism by Walter Block Part 5 Posted by: takadi Video duration: 478 seconds Global video hits: 2367 Walter Block at the Fraser Institute explaining the relationship between free market economics and environmentalism. Related: environmentalism, environment, walter, block, ron, paul, libertarianism, free, market, global, warming, pollution, green Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Excellent & ... By: darcybombdiggy. on 07 Feb 11, 23:25:09 Excellent & interesting opinons. I agree with much of what he says. But it seems the only consideration is for humans. What about everything else? And how will? all of this free enterprise be monitored? Our track record on self monitoring is not good.....Banks? Look at the oil & fishing industries. Even with regulation consumer demand and corporate activity has taken heavy tolls on the planet. Imagine without. Ask why is it that oil companies are big advocates of less government regulation....... Being able to opt ... By: Anon1696. on 30 Jul 10, 22:31:20 Being able to opt out of the program is the difference, as Takadi has stated in other? words. The main difference ... By: dumky. on 19 Jun 10, 12:50:19 The main difference is that non-profit companies are still subject to the price system and therefore profits and losses. A non-profit company cannot just bleed money/resources indefinitely and wastefully. Also, it is subject to competition. So, if the service it provides is not good enough for the amount of? funds it receives, the share of resources that it controls will shrink, to the benefit of competitors who are doing a better job. This was ... By: ncurran1987. on 26 May 10, 11:00:09 This was absolutely? brilliant Anarchist?? Nice ... By: elrondzik. on 05 Mar 10, 14:15:51 Anarchist?? Nice excuse but how did you come up with that idea? @elorondzik? Sorry, ... By: Stormwern. on 05 Mar 10, 11:59:26 @elorondzik? Sorry, I don't debate with anarchists, it tends to never get anywhere. Taxation has been around for 5000 years, get used to it. @Stormwern: There ... By: elrondzik. on 05 Mar 10, 08:17:39 @Stormwern: There is not such thing like "responsible top down control". You cannot responsibly take care about something which does not belong to you. This is a myth. In your example, the control has other goals: not the good of consumers/environment but to? produce greater results. Results are subject of your "responsible" care. Adding to that all ideology starting from class antagonism - you will end up taking care about yourself only. This is the "responsible" top-down control in practice. 3 We become seduced ... By: rayyf69. on 02 Feb 10, 21:40:54 3 We become seduced by great orators and assume that since they speak well they must be experts at trillions of other things so we grant them sovereignty that allows them to extend their alleged expertise to a lot of decision making. This is? a destructive assumption. The market economy is humanitys abandonment of superstition and movement toward a more objective or pragmatic methodology. The sooner we apply it to all decision making the better we will be. 2 miracle of ... By: rayyf69. on 02 Feb 10, 21:40:41 2 miracle of aggregation democracy. Neither of these things is true. Valuable knowledge is decentralized; often very mundane people have vital information that can benefit the social order.Centralizing decision making is, I believe,? an artifact of superstition. Weve yet to wipe away the residue of the divine rule of kings or gifted humans. 1 @stormwern ... By: rayyf69. on 02 Feb 10, 21:40:22 1 @stormwern Marxian polylogism doesn't work in nature because it doesn't work in reality. Polylogism emerges from different interest groups pursuing their utility in a political framework.Top down control is not responsible for very easy to understand reasons that are epistemological; knowledge is not centralized. Top down control assumes that 1. A? few gifted individuals possess socially valuable knowledge and 2. These individuals can be extracted out of the population via the - Marxian polylogism ... By: Stormwern. on 02 Feb 10, 14:03:03 Marxian polylogism doesn't work in nature, but we do have farms, very much artificial ecosystems. Top down control applied responsibly can? produce vastly greater results (for our purposes) than purely natural processes can on their own. I think i'm a bit ... By: evangrogers. on 02 Feb 10, 09:21:17 I think i'm a bit confused -you're asking how is a "non-profit, non-competitive entity whose funding does not relate to its performance" any different from the government? The answer is undeniably that government can? only get its money through theft, where as ANY private enterprise (that doesn't suck off the gov't's teat) gets its money voluntarily. Institutions rely ... By: Stormwern. on 01 Feb 10, 22:58:21 Institutions rely on the "charity" of the government budget. There? may be different mechanisms on the giving end, but it makes no difference to the receiver. it could be a ... By: evangrogers. on 01 Feb 10, 21:31:50 it could be a charity that doesn't rely on forcing people to give? it money privately owned? ... By: Estevinyo. on 27 Oct 09, 12:17:48 privately owned? from voluntary pools of capital, not "publicly" owned I was confused on ... By: takadi. on 24 Oct 09, 21:54:17 I was confused on that part as? well, but my guess is that he differentiates that from a government institution in that its funding doesn't come from taxes and is therefore a purely voluntary establishment The last example ... By: Stormwern. on 24 Oct 09, 21:40:16 The last example was a little puzzling: A non-profit, non-competitive entity? whose funding does not relate to its preformance. How does that differ from his description of a government institution? 4 Also i forgot to ... By: rayyf69. on 28 May 09, 05:10:47 4 Also i forgot to mention which is even more important. People that live in a state of poverty and struggle to obtain? food or shelter seek this before they seek a clean environment. The richer a society is the more the value what are called "normal goods" like the environment or ecosystem, pristine wilderness. So a system that attacks efficiency also attacks the realization of value of these goods. Would it be ... By: rayyf69. on 28 May 09, 04:53:15 Would it be preferable for 90% of the labor of a country to be involved in food production ? if so that leaves 10% for other forms of production. This is inefficient; Industrialization has enhanced efficiency, fewer peeps r employed in some productive? venue. That permits the exploration of higher levels of the hierarchy. Now this may be considered bad by an individual who thinks space tourism or expensive art is vice or a waste, but that is a subjective evaluation which has no objective worth. when i say demand ... By: rayyf69. on 28 May 09, 04:47:02 when i say demand is infinite that doesn't mean? that i want all the air on the planet , because each additional unit of air looses value to me(marginal theory of utility). What i mean is that i will demand Water, when that demand is met i will demand food, then shelter, then leisure, then social interaction etc etc to the point where my demands become somewhat extravagant eg. expensive artwork, a 2nd yacht to transport my cars. space tourism. This is Maslow's Hierarchy of needs. Marginal theory of ... By: rayyf69. on 28 May 09, 04:41:26 Marginal theory of utility? Demand is hardly ... By: McOath. on 28 May 09, 01:07:04 Demand is hardly infinite, take any example of a free finite commodity such as oxygen, do people consume it to the point of exhaustion no. If demand were infinite as you claim there'd be no waste in the market because everything supplied would be consumed except in cases of artificially high or low prices which we all know are not solely results of government interference, they often are the market attempting to deal with? changes in demand. It would make no sense if an infintie factor changed yes your right ... By: rayyf69. on 24 May 09, 08:14:19 yes your right falling rate of profit would be a problem, if demand was not infinite, which it is. The state interferes with that ability of the market to absorb excess labor by increasing teh costs of hiring labor. The result: unemployment. A Marxist may argue that it would be better to have 90% of the labor force involved in food production,? but the fact that 5 % is is not , i think a bad thing. That extra 85% labor force can be involved in other things like, Transit, housing, luxury. alright so may I ... By: McOath. on 13 May 09, 19:05:17 alright so may I pigeon hole you as a standard libretarian/anarcho capitalist? I absolutely agree the state is to blame for many many ills and should be abandoned, but I am by no means convinced capitalism is "what does the most good for the most people." I'd like someday to be given an historical example of the perfect free market promoted by libretarians. Otherwise I expect theoretical criticisms such as ''the falling rate of profit" will hold true regardless? of state actions. well we can never ... By: rayyf69. on 12 May 09, 22:13:03 well we can never have what's best for everyone. Consider north korean Communism. If they were to move to? a capitalist economy kim jong il would most likely be negatively effected. Capitalism does the most good for teh most amount of people. It's when the State interferes that negative outcomes occur. Yet the state rarely gets teh blame for these events. The market regulates greed and self interest. The government makes excessive greed, destructive greed rewarding.

U-Roy - Go There Natty (Audio) Posted by: planetolusola Video duration: 155 seconds Global video hits: 268150 Respect to the original deejay and dancehall inovator - Daddy U Roy. Album: Natty Rebel Track: Go There Natty Label: Virgin Records Released: 1976 Related: u-roy, reggae, jamaica, dancehall, natty-dread, roots, ska, natty-rebel Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: been looking? for ... By: johndidierkong. on 14 May 12, 21:41:18 been looking? for this for ages. thanks for uploading. i guess today i'm ... By: larryjaymusic. on 14 Mar 12, 11:17:07 i guess today i'm going back to my african jamaican root.(go there natty dread).? My? pleasure Tina. ... By: planetolusola. on 30 Dec 11, 01:59:51 My? pleasure Tina. Any relation to the late Nkemba? Listen to? roots ... By: doktornmannen. on 01 Dec 11, 17:19:12 Listen to? roots reggae pon uprising roots radios broadcast! Broadcasting 24/7 strictly rasta vibrations uprisingrootsradio(dot)blogspot(dot)com!! Tune in, watch videos and spread di word!! uprisingrootsradio(dot)blogspot(dot)com Blessings n love! God? bless for ... By: tinaojukwu. on 24 Nov 11, 05:04:26 God? bless for giving us what was the good life not just in Nigeria but West Africa mid to late 70s. Who can forget this? Thank you again. God bles for giving ... By: tinaojukwu. on 24 Nov 11, 05:00:28 God bles for giving us what wa the good? I think Stewart ... By: Auntkekebaby. on 04 Nov 11, 05:06:09 I think Stewart Copeland was listening to this. This is sick!? I believe? U-Roy is ... By: planetolusola. on 25 Oct 11, 02:42:09 I believe? U-Roy is available in on itune. Can you please let ... By: magennis9. on 25 Oct 11, 00:11:35 Can you please let me know how to get this song, where to buy it. in fact i was 13 when i heard this song. i am now 45, so i am dying to get my hand on this. can someone help?? i? like By: HakMan1989. on 16 Jun 11, 13:21:54 i? like @gls259 That reggae ... By: planetolusola. on 18 Mar 11, 21:15:55 @gls259 That reggae beat have a? way of working itself into every fiber of a man. I'm feeling it right now!! Yes man, West ... By: airmanchairman. on 15 Feb 11, 12:10:18 Yes man, West Africa rocked heavily to this song, heavily! I remember a night stop as a young commercial pilot in Warri, mid-western Nigeria when a record shop put on this record and played it loud and all? the children in the area I was passing screamed with delight and ran on to the street, dancing - they sang every delay in the song "go there Natty- dre-dre-dre-dre", and you should see the young girls "cut their waist" when it came to the voice & percussion. U-Roy is big in Africa! cjp 79,U-ROY est ... By: terguesh. on 25 Jan 11, 22:02:46 cjp 79,U-ROY est très fort? rasta naty dread ... By: Rodrigo12670. on 20 Jan 11, 01:14:43 rasta naty dread man zion ? 4 fans of justin? ... By: cronopiocomunista. on 20 Jan 11, 00:46:53 4 fans of justin? bieber disliked this mi? seh go de daddy ... By: msc010375. on 11 Dec 10, 04:58:04 mi? seh go de daddy u a you rule Straight from GHANA ... By: tardieh. on 05 Dec 10, 22:55:45 Straight from GHANA, in the city of KUMASI, ASHANTI REGION, AND I WAS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL. THIS SONG IS? ETCHED ON MY MIND, AND IT HAS BEEN FOR THE PAST 20+ YEARS. BIG UP U-ROY club norrick days . ... By: kobe10uk. on 04 Nov 10, 03:40:18 club norrick days ..seven sisters road ...skankng hard pon them? tune braaap Nostalgie! Un des ... By: Joliebebe2001. on 19 Oct 10, 12:35:14 Nostalgie! Un des best !? I like that. Reggae ... By: Malickeva. on 09 Sep 10, 14:15:04 I like that. Reggae = the only musique that? carries a true meaning: FREEDOM! It? sounds like ... By: cheveuxman. on 12 Aug 10, 02:13:29 It? sounds like Albert Griffiths to me but it's probably someone else! I'd like to know who sings the original too!! if someone knows please hit me back ! Nice to see how ... By: pw342. on 06 Aug 10, 14:47:31 Nice to see how much love there is around the world for? U Roy. I first bought one of his albums aged 13 in 1977 in England and I've loved him ever since. resoect!!!!!!! ya ... By: guandjo. on 24 Jul 10, 18:19:51 resoect!!!!!!! ya man, i' m from west Africa "NIGER" in the middle of Sahel and this music really remind me a lot.......personnel stuff.? TKS It's? dancing time! By: benokpala. on 18 Jul 10, 15:58:09 It's? dancing time! jah blessings to ... By: TheBoogalow. on 01 Jul 10, 07:43:59 jah blessings to you,planetolusola,it reminds me of days back as a kid,before i became dread,i? makwa na isi gi na atu egwu baby natty day,dats the way we sang it then, as a kid.greetings to uroy for this track,pupa boogalow,ireland

ENVIRONMENTALISM: Worldwide Poverty, Deindustrialization, And Genocide -- Webster Tarpley Posted by: LibertyTruthJustice Video duration: 3303 seconds Global video hits: 1253 Club of Rome -- United Nations -- John Holdren -- Ecoscience -- Deindustrialization -- Poverty, Famine, Destitution -- Paul Ehrlich and "The Population Bomb" -- "The Limits to Growth" -- Malthusianism, Neo-Malthusianism -- Social Darwinism -- Anti-Human Ideology -- Global Warming Myth -- Eugenics -- Nazism www.infowars.com Related: john, holdren, club, of, rome, ehrlich, paul, anne, limits, to, growth, ecoscience, alex, jones, population, bomb, obama, science, czar, green, policies, imf, world, bank, mcnamara, pentagon, un, united, nations, planetary, regime, global, government, sterilization, abortion, implants, compulsory, economic, depression, bentham, malthus, marx, engels, darwin, genocidal, british, empire, anti, human, oligarchy, fascism, nazism, socialism, soviet, reduction, warming, climate, change, pseudoscience, charlatans, foundations, eugenics Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: The science ... By: cincofone. on 21 Nov 11, 08:18:52 The science surrounding the bell curve isn't wrong though, and doesn't declare one race as being superior to others (if average IQ? was the determinant of superiority, whites wouldn't come on top!) Dr. Evil from ... By: FaithandReasons. on 14 Jul 11, 19:56:30 Dr. Evil from Austin Powers is a parody of Maurice Strong.? @lilisigel To ... By: LibertyTruthJustice. on 29 Jun 11, 21:29:47 @lilisigel To follow or not to follow someone, that is your question. Well, God gave each of us a brain, and people should put it to good? use, as individuals. So, the question should be, to study or not to study Holdren's, and the Wall Street foundations', actions. And these are public record. No need for speculation. Patience, self-discipline and a bit of time is all that's required. If not, people will easily fall into the various divide and rule games that are deliberately put out there. I'm sure there are ... By: lilisigel. on 29 Jun 11, 20:59:00 I'm sure there are agents everywhere pretending to be pro-animal, agents are everywhere in any movement including yours. And even if everything what Tarpley said is real ( which I doubt ), we will have our way to resolve animal situation not yours or Tarpley's way, that is? for sure. Please understand, we know there is no any good guy here, it is the same old game and greed for power, so we will act separate and different making sure animals will be finally free. Exactly, we can ... By: 1221solstice2012. on 29 Jun 11, 20:56:50 Exactly, we can only trust ourselves...too much deliberate confusion coming from both sides here, and where there's deliberate confusion there's deception. To agree with what you said before, Holdren is a product of "humanity's" evil and just one tool to deliver it back to them. People need to change, stop enslaving and killing animals, or they'll learn what? it's like firsthand, and then they will know the true meaning of suffering. Well, for me ... By: lilisigel. on 29 Jun 11, 20:29:27 Well, for me Tarpley is not a good example to follow anyway so the issue itself is not very clear. I don't trust this man and he is for perpetuating the animal slavery? anyway and not only, his way of seeing things, the way he is talking shows a cruel person who did not have yet the chance and power to do evil. Why should I take his words for granted?To take action because he says ? Maybe this is a new nwo's trick, they like to play the both sides, the good and the evil. @lilisigel Well, ... By: LibertyTruthJustice. on 29 Jun 11, 19:30:16 @lilisigel Well, you didn't address my issue. This is very clearcut. If you're for animal rights, you have, by definition, to denounce the big boys like Holdren and his Wall Street backers, foundations included, as these are the people who are doing most to destroy animal life on Earth. Worse, they do this with the cover of claiming to be pro-animal; they even fund quite a few so-called animal rights NGOs, to go out and provocateur, and so on. If you truly love animals, this? has to bother you. In conclusion, ... By: lilisigel. on 29 Jun 11, 18:41:59 In conclusion, vegans and animal rights activist will take one side and that is Animal Liberation and equal rights for animals, if people are for enslaving animals well, it means they like the evil system so they should have it and this John? Holdren will have his way of doing it.No more complains about this and face the reality, people are not all selfish living only for themselves, many are ready to sacrifice their lives and freedom for Animal Liberation, think about this. @ ... By: lilisigel. on 29 Jun 11, 18:14:28 @LibertyTruthJusticeThe human civilization learned very well from its illuminati tyrants how to enslave others, human or animals, this is the real problem.There will be no freedom and unity until the whole planet enslaving system will? be dissolved. It is a shame to talk about freedom and how bad the nwo is if you do exactly the same to others. I don't support carbon tax or climate change or other nonsense but I don't support your views for perpetuating the old way of tyranny over animals either. @MGGoblin If farms ... By: lilisigel. on 29 Jun 11, 17:46:54 @MGGoblin If farms will disappear in the future I suppose animals will be protected by law and not killed. And why is so difficult for you to understand what @1221solstice2012 explained so clear ?We want animals to be free and not humanity's slaves period.Vegans and animal rights activists are not the one supporting the system, the corporations are not making products for us because we don't need? them, the animal slaughter is done for animal consumers, also the medical system and medicine, etc. What kind of ... By: lilisigel. on 29 Jun 11, 17:26:22 What kind of altruism is to encourage people to bring more children who are innocent souls in this corrupted and cruel world ? For them to be the next generation of slaves ? Of course you must improve before multiplying, if not, you deliberately are pro enslavement and I don't see any altruism here only a? big lie like many other lies playing with people's minds for example religions and other institutions '' pro life '' who in fact they are the one supporting the same evil system. Please don't reply ... By: 1221solstice2012. on 29 Jun 11, 06:54:39 Please don't reply after this, I can't go on forever in here. I promote veganism & animal liberation. Industrialization has made people' vile practice of growing & slaughtering animals into something? so grotesquely evil that it defies words. This Tarpley scoffs at animals having the right to be free of slavery and killing by us. That's all I needed to hear. You mentioned lions & zebras earlier, as if people require meat. We do not, and YES there is a huge amount wrong with it. Bye now. Please listen to " ... By: MGGoblin. on 29 Jun 11, 02:03:37 Please listen to "LibertyTruthJustice" - brutality towards animals is a problem, I agree with you. Wath I do not agree is the belief that "stoping indistry" will somehow magically end our problems. If? people like Holdren succeed in their agenda, farms will dissapear. People will start killing animals to eat. Reducing technology is a descent into barbarism. Improving it can produce a more civiliced society. (Where, for example, there could be no need of raising cows) =) Peace. First of all. I'm ... By: MGGoblin. on 29 Jun 11, 01:58:32 First of all. I'm not "using" Orwell as an? "ally" because there is no war in this. I just quoted him in one issue, not the question if vegetarians are or not evil. That's not my problem. All those problems you quoted are created by people like Holdren, the use of animals in experiments to see how they can manipulate them, etc. is the use of science to stop development, not to improve it. Technology can be used to free people or to enslave them. @1221solstice2012 ... By: LibertyTruthJustice. on 28 Jun 11, 21:00:03 @1221solstice2012 Well, if you really like animals, your prime effort should be to denounce people like Holdren. These characters will only use animal rights slogans, and movements, to get particular economic agendas across, at which point the slogans and the movements are disposed of like damp rags. Holdren and his Wall Street sponsors are the prime force pushing the radical use of genome alteration in nature, and this kills entire ecossystems. So they are, or should be, your main? nemesis. Just ONE more point ... By: 1221solstice2012. on 28 Jun 11, 20:45:43 Just ONE more point: The Road to Wigan Pier (1937) is where George Orwell was very hostile to? vegetarians, while he was a revolutionary socialist; he changed his politics and his view of animals, vegetarians, and slaughter after writing Animal Farm (1945) which was a satire against socialism...so stop using him as an "ally" in your cause. Thanks :-) And "development" in 1984 refers to POSITIVE human development, not brutal dominion over the innocent/helpless. ...Vegan for love of life! Humans have " ... By: 1221solstice2012. on 28 Jun 11, 20:19:44 Humans have "developed" into monsters; as a whole only shameful. We are trying to reverse that ugly situation. Factory farms, vivisection labs, fur farms, slaughterhouses...all that...have no place in a dignified, peaceful human civilization, which is why we don't have that. People are? are despicable. And "global warming" is not my thing...global bloodshed of the tortured innocents is. The slaughter will be stopped, or may Holdren's ilk have their way. Stop now, I'm done here. That's it. Being a ... By: MGGoblin. on 28 Jun 11, 14:39:09 That's it. Being a pseudo-altruist (pseudo, because real altruists like me, concern with the respect for life, not with stoping life) it's the same that being an eco-terrorist. Always human development is a problem. You? should read "1984" by George Orwell in wich he explains that stopping development BY ANY EXCUSE is the key for oligarchy. There is no overpopulation. There is no global warming. Those are two big lies. Don't bother me? ... By: 1221solstice2012. on 28 Jun 11, 10:32:07 Don't bother me? with this stuff...tootles. (Part 2) with this ... By: MGGoblin. on 28 Jun 11, 10:12:37 (Part 2) with this "environmentalist malthusian" policy, the onlything that saves Congo's children lifes is? going to vanish. Less farms, less water supply (with that silly excuse: "We are running out of water", wich is not true) and less economic development. It's not only a big lie, it is a monstrosity. Population is not a problem, your quote "Improve before multiplyng" is nonsense. If there wasn't enough food in the world, these people would simply just not breed. It's basic. PS: There is a ... By: MGGoblin. on 28 Jun 11, 10:07:49 PS: There is a great difference between polluting and industry. Industry itself is not bad. I can tell you... I studied sustainable development and environmental problems. Industry is not bad, It's simply not perfect, and the only way that you can change pollution is by improving it. Population is not a problem if you have the technology to feed all. In Africa, Congo started improving their industry and immediatly, poverty, disease and? hunger started to vanish, but (Follows...) @1221solstice2012 @ ... By: MGGoblin. on 28 Jun 11, 10:03:27 @1221solstice2012 @1221solstice2012 You seem to? hate the word "selfish" very selfishly... There is nothing wrong with eating animals. There is a great difference between torture and feeding. Yoy can easily recognize a Lion eating a Zebra, and you can difference between a Lion torturing a Zebra. ¿Why don't you difference a human eating, and a human torturing? For the eco-terrorists everything that human species does is selfish. But somehow, animals that haverst (like ants) are not selfish... You seem to hate ... By: MGGoblin. on 28 Jun 11, 10:02:20 You seem to hate the word "selfish" very? selfishly... There is nothing wrong with eating animals. There is a great difference between torture and feeding. Yoy can easily recognize a Lion eating a Zebra, and you can difference between a Lion torturing a Zebra. ¿Why can you don't understand a human eating, and a human torturing? For the eco-terrorists everything that human species does is selfish. But somehow, animals that haverst (like ants) are not selfish... thanks for the ... By: FINISUNIVERSI. on 28 Jun 11, 09:03:38 thanks for the link? :) Destruction of the ... By: realisrealizerealies. on 28 Jun 11, 04:26:48 Destruction of the Family, Stress, Anxiety, Incarceration, Hart attacks, Diarrhea, involuntary sterilization by? prescription are due to Physical & Mental Economic Deprivational means & 'Private Security' & Military means...Etc...This is what IS happening NOW!! Watch at 27:10

Environmentalism on the Half Shell Posted by: NationalGeographic Video duration: 362 seconds Global video hits: 12814 Once plentiful, can Chesapeake Bay oysters make a comeback? Chef and National Geographic Fellow Barton Seaver visits the owners of hundred-year-old oyster company who are working to keep the famous oysters on the map?and on our plates. Learn how farming helps restore oyster populations, then follow Seaver's easy recipe for grilled oysters. Related: oyster, chesapeake bay, barton seaver, seaver, ocean, marine, fishing, national geographic Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: It is a theory only ... By: culwin. on 02 Jan 11, 18:53:08 It is a theory only? ? WTF? You do know there are humans living in caves RIGHT NOW, right? And who do you think drew all the cave paintings found throughout the world? Leprechauns? this is a ... By: alphafirstoneyou. on 01 Jan 11, 08:30:54 this is a commercial. your? soooo cool to eat a raw oyster. Don't teach people to eat raw seafood! would you encourage people to drink unpaturized milk? this is a? ... By: alphafirstoneyou. on 01 Jan 11, 08:26:21 this is a? commercial disgusting? By: thedetective22. on 30 Dec 10, 22:33:48 disgusting? Wow eating oysters ... By: brownbear696969. on 30 Dec 10, 06:16:43 Wow eating oysters and saying it is environmentalism is probably the most smug thing a person can do and saying he is helping them really makes him able to go? to sleep at night my general response ... By: mindbodylightsound10. on 27 Dec 10, 23:20:06 my general response to people who advocate eating crabs, oysters & fish is "if you wouldn't drink the water then you shouldn't eat the things that live in it". i think that's pretty common sense. the water? here (i live off a small creek on the choptank) is simply revolting. the stench at low tide is like a giant toxic marsh fart. i've been in this water, i've had the mud between my toes and i avoid it like the plague because, it nearly is like a plague in terms of it's toxicity. So? what would you ... By: onepcwhiz. on 27 Dec 10, 21:40:10 So? what would you eat from the bay? please stop calling ... By: mindbodylightsound10. on 26 Dec 10, 23:23:11 please stop calling yourself an environmentalist. eating oysters to eliminate bay pollution is about as stupid as bombing for peace is. i've lived on the bay my whole life and oysters without a question are the most vital thing to the bay ecosystem. consuming them is the worst possible idea because not only is it bad for the bay but you're literally eating a filter of all the pollution, shit and runoff that? goes into the bay. would you eat the brush you just scrubbed the toilet with? no!! oyster with a ... By: Peter421. on 26 Dec 10, 13:04:04 oyster with a little bit of hot sauce and lemon mmmm? dang.. wanna? go ... By: yohoooniee. on 25 Dec 10, 03:35:10 dang.. wanna? go oyster hunting now sounds good? By: MrMMABoy. on 25 Dec 10, 00:27:40 sounds good? Thumbs up? if ... By: jakemx4. on 24 Dec 10, 22:31:36 Thumbs up? if environmentalists ruin every thing thats fun NAH just trying to ... By: Jigiligy. on 24 Dec 10, 19:03:15 NAH just trying to convince how ediotic you are. Ya I know even? I am more ediotic. The fight ends here you really wanna ... By: MrMMABoy. on 24 Dec 10, 18:00:11 you really wanna figh over the internet do you? ? ... By: Jigiligy. on 24 Dec 10, 16:38:27 Blalalalalaaalaalbbbalalala? look at your ego....."I have better things to do" haha you sound like a chick. you should be ashamed i laughed at your ... By: MrMMABoy. on 24 Dec 10, 13:53:01 i laughed at your comment. im in no way trying to be a badass by eating food xD. and im not gonna eat my family xd? and pls dont reply again i have better things to do no problem loser. i ... By: Jigiligy. on 24 Dec 10, 13:48:52 no problem loser. i bet youre feeling so hard "oh look at me, I eat meat, I'm so badass" Go eat your family? too i have nothing to ... By: MrMMABoy. on 24 Dec 10, 13:15:42 i have nothing to do with the animal? being killed. i'll eat my good food, you go eat your bread yup quite true, but ... By: Jigiligy. on 24 Dec 10, 13:14:24 yup quite true, but wat about people eating chicken, pork, beef n ham?? ? Because dogs feel ... By: Warcraft40. on 24 Dec 10, 13:03:43 ? Because dogs feel pain and have a brain whilst oysters feel no pain nor have a brain. Its pretty much like eating a plant. your choice, your ... By: Jigiligy. on 24 Dec 10, 11:57:56 your choice, your choice to have an animal killed for? some fatty food....Absolutely your choice fuck that im eating ... By: MrMMABoy. on 24 Dec 10, 02:43:15 fuck that im eating my? hamburger! fuck? that im ... By: MrMMABoy. on 24 Dec 10, 02:42:34 fuck? that im eating my hamburger! haha soo set up in ... By: DemonAeon123. on 24 Dec 10, 00:37:38 haha soo set up in the end!? :) That's some.? ... By: SSTTEEAALLTTHH. on 23 Dec 10, 21:59:57 That's some.? Evolution made us omnivores, if there were ever vegetarian hominids, they are gone now, they didn't survive selection against the omnivores. People eat to much meat these days, there is an overconsumption, but you can't advocate not eating anything that once lived from a biological point of view.

Social Bookmarking